|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 99, Zeilen: (1-2), 101-103, (103-106) |
Quelle: Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege - Freedom of Speech 1999 Seite(n): 1 (Internetquelle), Zeilen: - |
|---|---|
| [Strangers] also may take part in the proceedings of a House, for example by giving evidence before it or one of its committees, or by securing presentation of a petition.”301
301 May, 22nd ed., 1997, p.95. While referring to this definition, J P Joseph Maingot, Parliamentary Privilege in Canada(2nd ed), McGill-Queen’s University press, 1997, p.80 gives this supplementary definition: “As a technical parliamentary term, ‘proceedings’ are the events and the steps leading up to some formal action, including a decision, taken by the House in its collective capacity. All of these steps and events, the whole process by which the House reaches a decision (the principal part of which is called debate), are “proceedings”. |
98. [...] Strangers also may take part in the proceedings of a House, for example by giving evidence before it or one of its committees, or by securing presentation of a petition.'[152]
152 22nd ed (1997), p 95. While referring to this definition, J P Joseph Maingot QC, in Parliamentary Privilege in Canada (1997), p 80 gives this supplementary definition: `As a technical parliamentary term, `proceedings' are the events and the steps leading up to some formal action, including a decision, taken by the House in its collective capacity. All of these steps and events, the whole process by which the House reaches a decision (the principal part of which is called debate), are `proceedings. |
Kein Hinweis auf eine Übernahme. Auch wenn hier Zitate wie im Original deutlich als solche erkennbar sind, ist hier doch die gesamte Verweisstruktur in toto übernommen worden. |
|