(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<plb_layout val_1="049" val_2="101-103" val_3="[[Fn. 146] [...]] Liesse, S. 141: "The foreign enemy could not, because of the private character of the Bank, …“) |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| − | <plb_layout val_1="049" val_2="101-103" val_3="[[Fn. 146] [ |
+ | <plb_layout val_1="049" val_2="101-103" val_3="[[Fn. 146] [Dies erwies sich in politisch kritischen Situationen, so im deutsch-französischen Krieg 1870/71, als vorteilhaft:]] Liesse, S. 141: "The foreign enemy could not, because of the private character of the Bank, consider its wealth as spoils of war, without trampling under foot international law. The case would have been entirely different had the Bank been a State bank."" val_4="116 / 172 [Fußnote]" val_5="04-08 / 03 [Fußnote]" val_6="[Indeed, after the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870, another advantage was claimed for retaining private ownership:] thus Liesse[13] writes, "The foreign enemy, it is true, could not, because of the private character of the Bank, consider its wealth as spoils of war, without trampling under foot international law. The case would have been entirely different had the Bank been a State bank. [...]" [Fn. 13] Ibid., p. 141." val_7="KomplettPlagiat" val_9="Goodhart 1988" val_10="[[:Kategorie:Goodhart_1988|Goodhart_1988]]" val_11="" val_cswikitext="[[Kategorie:Skm 049]] [[Kategorie:KomplettPlagiat]] [[Kategorie:Goodhart 1988]] [[Kategorie:Fragment]]" layout_id="1748" cswikitext="[[Kategorie:Skm 049]] [[Kategorie:KomplettPlagiat]] [[Kategorie:Goodhart 1988]] [[Kategorie:Fragment]]"></plb_layout> |
Version vom 3. Mai 2011, 12:21 Uhr
<plb_layout val_1="049" val_2="101-103" val_3="[[Fn. 146] [Dies erwies sich in politisch kritischen Situationen, so im deutsch-französischen Krieg 1870/71, als vorteilhaft:]] Liesse, S. 141: "The foreign enemy could not, because of the private character of the Bank, consider its wealth as spoils of war, without trampling under foot international law. The case would have been entirely different had the Bank been a State bank."" val_4="116 / 172 [Fußnote]" val_5="04-08 / 03 [Fußnote]" val_6="[Indeed, after the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870, another advantage was claimed for retaining private ownership:] thus Liesse[13] writes, "The foreign enemy, it is true, could not, because of the private character of the Bank, consider its wealth as spoils of war, without trampling under foot international law. The case would have been entirely different had the Bank been a State bank. [...]" [Fn. 13] Ibid., p. 141." val_7="KomplettPlagiat" val_9="Goodhart 1988" val_10="Goodhart_1988" val_11="" val_cswikitext=" " layout_id="1748" cswikitext=" "></plb_layout>