4 gesichtete Fragmente: "Verdächtig" oder "Keine Wertung"
| [1.] Sai/Fragment 030 00 - Diskussion Bearbeitet: 14. May 2021, 11:42 (WiseWoman) Erstellt: 12. December 2020, 09:20 Klgn | Fragment, Gesichtet, KeineWertung, Reif 2015, SMWFragment, Sai, Schutzlevel sysop |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 30, Zeilen: figure |
Quelle: Reif 2015 Seite(n): online, Zeilen: figure |
|---|---|
Fig. °10 Overview of generations and related cohort |
|
This fragment is conservatively categorized as Keine Wertung, not counted, although there are two other fragments from this source on subsequent pages (Fragment 031 30, Fragment 033 10). |
|
| [2.] Sai/Fragment 018 27 - Diskussion Bearbeitet: 14. May 2021, 19:52 (WiseWoman) Erstellt: 22. December 2020, 20:21 Mendelbrno | Fragment, Gesichtet, KeineWertung, Kraus-und-partner.de n.d., SMWFragment, Sai, Schutzlevel |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 18, Zeilen: 27-37 |
Quelle: kraus-und-partner.de n.d. Seite(n): online, Zeilen: 0 |
|---|---|
| Douglas McGregor, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), studied the relationships between different styles of leadership and their respective images of men in the 1950s. Here McGregor distinguished between two different leadership philosophies: Theories X and Y (McGregor, 1960).
Theory X assumes that man is naturally lazy and tries to avoid work as much as possible. As a consequence, in order to make a productive contribution to the company's success, it must be strongly controlled and guided (ibid). Theory Y, in contrast to the theory X, assumes that man is quite ambitious, sets himself goals, and enjoys his achievement. The task of superiors is therefore to create conditions that motivate people to work on their own responsibility (ibid). McGregor, D. (1960). Theory X and theory Y. In Organization theory, 358, 374. |
In den 50er Jahren untersuchte Douglas McGregor, Professor am Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), die Zusammenhänge unterschiedlicher Führungsstile und ihre jeweils zugrunde liegenden Menschenbilder. Hierbei unterschied McGregor zwischen zwei unterschiedlichen Führungsphilosophien: Den Theorien X und Y.
Die Theorie X nimmt an, dass der Mensch von Natur aus faul ist und versucht der Arbeit so gut es geht aus dem Weg zu gehen. In Konsequenz muss er, um einen produktiven Beitrag zum Unternehmenserfolg zu leisten, stark kontrolliert und angeleitet werden. Im Gegensatz zur Theorie X geht die Theorie Y davon aus, dass der Mensch durchaus ehrgeizig ist, sich selbst Ziele setzt und Freude an seiner Leistung hat. Daher sind von den Vorgesetzten Bedingungen zu schaffen, die den Menschen zur selbstverantwortlichen Arbeit motivieren. |
Continues on the next page Fragment 019 01. There are some dubious references on the Internet to McGregor, D. (1960). Theory X and theory Y. Organization theory, 358-374. however, the theory was proposed in a book. McGregor, Douglas M. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960. A journal Organization theory that was published in 1960 could not be located. This fragment is a close translation of the source given, but the date of the identified apparent source could not be reliably determined. Therefore this fragment is classified as Keine Wertung and not counted. |
|
| [3.] Sai/Fragment 019 01 - Diskussion Bearbeitet: 14. May 2021, 19:52 (WiseWoman) Erstellt: 22. December 2020, 20:31 Mendelbrno | Fragment, Gesichtet, KeineWertung, Kraus-und-partner.de n.d., SMWFragment, Sai, Schutzlevel |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 19, Zeilen: 1-3 |
Quelle: kraus-und-partner.de n.d. Seite(n): online, Zeilen: 0 |
|---|---|
| It has shown that both a leadership style based on theory X and a leadership style on theory Y can work well in practice. However, it should be noted that the two leadership styles lead to different corporate cultures. | Es hat sich gezeigt, dass sowohl ein Führungsstil nach Theorie X als auch ein Führungsstil nach Theorie Y in der Praxis gut funktionieren kann. Allerdings ist zu beachten, dass die beiden Führungsstile zu unterschiedlichen Unternehmenskulturen führen. |
Continued from the previous page Fragment 018 27. This fragment is a close translation of the source given, but the date of the identified apparent source could not be reliably determined. Therefore this fragment is classified as Keine Wertung and not counted. |
|
| [4.] Sai/Fragment III 01 - Diskussion Bearbeitet: 22. March 2021, 15:02 (Schumann) Erstellt: 27. December 2020, 12:25 Klgn | Fragment, Gesichtet, KeineWertung, SMWFragment, Sai, Schutzlevel, Yusuf 2018 |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 000, Zeilen: 1 ff. |
Quelle: Yusuf 2018 Seite(n): 4, Zeilen: 1 ff. |
|---|---|
| Acknowledgement
After an intensive period of 24 months, today is the day: writing this note of thanks is the finishing touch on my dissertation. It has been a period of intense learning for me, not only in the scientific arena, but also on a personal level. Writing this dissertation has had a big impact on me. I would like to reflect on the people who have supported and helped me so much throughout this period. I would first like to thank my colleagues from Industry and Chamber of Commerce, Spitta Verlag GmbH & Co. KG in Balingen and dent.kom in Berlin and all the residential doctors and participants I asked for support for their wonderful collaboration. You supported me greatly and were always willing to help me. In addition, I would like to thank my supervisor, Helena Chlàdkovà for her valuable guidance, her sympathic presence and her motivating nature. You definitely provided me with the tools that I needed to choose the right direction and successfully complete my dissertation. I would also like to thank my husband [...] and my family for their wise counsel and sympathetic ear. You were always there for me. Also I want to thank my friends [...] for their inspiring person-to-person exchange. Finally, there is my beloved son [...] who always gives me strenght [...] and joy, he is the best thing in my life and he put back a lot of times when I was writing this dissertation. Therefore I want to especially thank my wonderful husband who compensated this time as a marvellous father and friend of mine. Thank you very much, everyone! |
[page iv]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT After an intensive period of several months, today is the day: writing this note of thanks is the finishing touch on my research proposal. It has been a period of intense learning for me, not only in the academic arena, but also on a personal level. Writing this research proposal has had a big impact on me. I would like to reflect on the people who have supported and helped me so much throughout this period. I would first like to thank my colleagues from my internship at JKUAT for their wonderful collaboration. You supported me greatly and were always willing to help me. I would particularly like to single out my supervisor, Aaron L. Mukhongo I want to thank you for your excellent cooperation and for all of the opportunities I was given to conduct my research proposal and further my proposal. In addition, I would like to thank all my lecturers, for their valuable guidance. You definitely provided me with the tools that I needed to choose the right direction and successfully complete my thesis. I would also like to thank my parents for their wise counsel and sympathetic ear. You are always there for me. Finally, there are my friends. We were not only able to support each other by deliberating over our problems and findings, but also happily by talking about things other than just our papers. Thank you very much, everyone! |
The source is not given. It is only documented here and not counted in the number of pages that contain plagiarism. |
|