Angaben zur Quelle [Bearbeiten]
Titel | Adapting the EU’s approach to today’s security challenges— the Review of the 2003 European Security Strategy |
Herausgeber | House of Lords |
Datum | 21. November 2008 |
URL | https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldeucom/190/190.pdf |
Literaturverz. |
yes |
Fußnoten | yes |
Fragmente | 3 |
[1.] Ama/Fragment 054 17 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2017-09-15 16:09:24 PlagProf:-) | Ama, BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, House of Lords 2008, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop |
|
|
Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 54, Zeilen: 17-23 |
Quelle: House of Lords 2008 Seite(n): 7, 8, Zeilen: 7: 7 ff.; 8: 29 ff. |
---|---|
In December 2003, the Member States of the European Union agreed a "European Security Strategy" (ESS), in the wake of the divisions among Members caused largely by the invasion of Iraq.
The European Security Strategy was presented by Mr. Javier Solana to the European Council meeting on 12 December 2003. Its aim was to formulate a European approach to the EU's security, particularly after the divisions caused by the Iraq war.216 216 Adapting the EU's approach to today's security challenges — the Review of the 2003 European Security Strategy, House of Lords, European Union Committee, 31st Report of Session 2007-08, p. 4, published 21 November 2008, available on: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldeucom/190/190.pdf, last visited on 15 March 2009. |
In December 2003, the Member States of the European Union (EU) agreed a “European Security Strategy” (ESS)1 in the wake of the divisions among Members caused largely by the invasion of Iraq.
[page 8] 7. The European Security Strategy was presented by Dr Javier Solana to the European Council meeting on 12 December 2003. Its aim was to formulate a European approach to the EU’s security, particularly after the divisions caused by the Iraq war, as we have noted. See Appendix No 5. |
The source is mentioned, but with an inaccurate page number. Nothing has been marked as a citation. The copied text spans across paragraphs. |
|
[2.] Ama/Fragment 054 27 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2017-11-08 21:49:22 Schumann | Ama, BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, House of Lords 2008, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop |
|
|
Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 54, Zeilen: 27-32 |
Quelle: House of Lords 2008 Seite(n): 7, 8, Zeilen: 7: 32 f.; 8: 1 ff. |
---|---|
The 2003 Strategy is structured in three parts: The first section lists the global challenges, which are described as interdependence and globalisation, including conflicts, inadequate development, pandemics, global warming and energy dependence. This section also lists a wide range of threats — terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional conflicts, state failure and organised crime. The second section outlines the strategic objectives for the Euro-[pean Union in addressing those threats, building security in the EU's neighbourhood and international order based on effective multilateralism.] | 3. The 2003 Strategy is in three parts: the first section lists the global challenges, which it describes as interdependence and globalisation,
[page 8] including conflicts, inadequate development, pandemics, global warming and energy dependence. This section also lists a wide range of threats—terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), regional conflicts, state failure and organised crime. A second section outlines the strategic objectives for the European Union (EU) as addressing the threats, building security in the EU’s neighbourhood and an international order based on effective multilateralism. |
The source is mentioned in the preceding paragraph. Nothing has been marked as a citation. |
|
[3.] Ama/Fragment 055 01 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2017-09-15 16:30:21 PlagProf:-) | Ama, BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, House of Lords 2008, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop |
|
|
Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 55, Zeilen: 1-20, 101-107 |
Quelle: House of Lords 2008 Seite(n): 7, 8, 9, Zeilen: 7: 9 ff., 102-107; 8:4-9.11-12; 9: 28ff. |
---|---|
[The second section outlines the strategic objectives for the Euro]pean Union in addressing those threats, building security in the EU’s neighbourhood and international order based on effective multilateralism. In the third section, the ESS calls for the EU to be more active, more capable and coherent, without determining how the EU should achieve this.
As can be seen from the above, the strategy describes broad categories of threats, but does not cover every possible security risk or specific threat. The European Security Strategy represented the collective thinking of Member States on the challenges and security threats facing them at the beginning of the 21st century, as perceived in 2003. The ESS is not a strategy in the military sense of prescribing detailed actions and set timelines. However, it does helpfully define a common approach to the main security challenges and sets out three important EU security objectives: addressing the threats, building security in the EU's neighbourhood and working with other states and organisations to achieve "effective multilateralism".217 Four years later, in December 2007, in the light of a changing international situation, the enlargement of the EU and developments in the EU's own Security and Defence Policy, the European Council called on the Secretary General/High Representative, Javier Solana , to review the Strategy, and in particular its implementation. This was to be done in full association with the Commission and in close cooperation with the Member States.218 217 Ibid., p. 10. 218 Javier Solana was asked to examine the implementation of the 2003 European Security Strategy "with a view to proposing elements on how to improve the implementation and, as appropriate, elements to complement it for adoption by the Europe Council in December 2008", available on Council Conclusions website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/97669.pdf, last visited on 15 March 2009. |
Four years later, in December 2007, in the light of the changing international situation, the enlargement of the EU and developments in the EU’s own Security and Defence Policy2, the European Council called on the Secretary General/High Representative, Dr Javier Solana, to review the Strategy, and in particular its implementation. This was to be done in full association with the Commission and in close cooperation with the Member States3.
2 European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) 3 Council Conclusions website www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/97669.pdf. Dr Solana was asked to examine the implementation of the 2003 European Security Strategy “with a view to proposing elements on how to improve the implementation and, as appropriate, elements to complement it, for adoption by the European Council in December 2008” [page 8] A second section outlines the strategic objectives for the European Union (EU) as addressing the threats, building security in the EU’s neighbourhood and an international order based on effective multilateralism. In a third section the ESS calls for the EU to be more active, more capable and coherent, without determining how the EU should achieve this. [...] 4. As can be seen from the above, the Strategy describes broad categories of threat but does not cover every possible security risk or specific threat. [page 9] 11. The European Security Strategy represents the collective thinking of Member States on the challenges and security threats facing them at the beginning of the 21st century, as perceived in 2003. The ESS is not a strategy in the military sense of prescribing detailed actions and set timelines. However, it does helpfully define a common approach to the main security challenges and sets three important EU security objectives: addressing the threats, building security in the EU’s neighbourhood and working with other states and organisations to achieve “effective multilateralism”. |
Nothing has been marked as a citation. The true source is named only on the previous page, with a different page number (4). This fragment could alternatively be classified as "Verschleierung". |
|