|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 95, Zeilen: 1-8 |
Quelle: Xu and Chen 2003 Seite(n): 233, Zeilen: 1-4 |
|---|---|
| For example, capture of central members in a network may effectively upset the operational network and put a terrorist organization out of action (Baker, W.E. and Faulkner, R.R., 1993; McAndrew, D., 1999; Sparrow, M., 1991). Subgroups and interaction patterns between groups are helpful in finding a network’s overall structure, which often reveals points of vulnerability (Evan, W. M., 1972; Ronfeldt, D., Arquilla, J., 2001 ). | [For exam]ple, removal of central members in a network may effectively upset the operational network and put a criminal enterprise out of action [3, 17, 21]. Subgroups and interaction patterns between groups are helpful for finding a network’s overall structure, which often reveals points of vulnerability [9, 19].
[EN 3] Baker, W. E., Faulkner R. R.: The social organization of conspiracy: illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, Vol. 58, No. 12. (1993) 837–860. [EN 17] McAndrew, D.: The structural analysis of criminal networks. In: Canter, D., Alison, L. (eds.): The Social Psychology of Crime: Groups, Teams, and Networks, Offender Profiling Series, III, Aldershot, Dartmouth (1999) 53–94. [EN 21] Sparrow, M. K.: The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: An assessment of the prospects. Social Networks, Vol. 13. (1991) 251–274. [EN 9] Evan, W. M.: An organization-set model of interorganizational relations. In: M. Tuite, R. Chisholm, M. Radnor (eds.): Interorganizational Decision-making. Aldine, Chicago (1972) 181–200. [EN 19] Ronfeldt, D., Arquilla, J.: What next for networks and netwars? In: Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D. (eds.): Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Rand Press, (2001). |
Continuation from previous page. This section appears in Nm's thesis for the second time, the first time was here: Nm/Fragment 021 01 |
|