von Nasrullah Memon
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
| [1.] Nm/Fragment 057 11 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2012-04-13 12:39:16 WiseWoman | Fragment, Gesichtet, Nm, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Terrorism research 2005, Verschleierung |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 57, Zeilen: 11-29 |
Quelle: terrorism_research_2005 Seite(n): 1, Zeilen: 2 |
|---|---|
| The organizational structure determines the strengths and weaknesses of a group. Knowledge about prevalent models of terrorist organizations leads to a better understanding of their capabilities and targets. Knowledge of the different labels and systems of classification that have been applied to groups and individuals aid in discarding useless or irrelevant terms, and in understanding the purposes and usefulness of different terminologies.
Traditionally, a specific political agenda, ideological motivation or the desire for national or ethic liberation dominates the understanding of terrorism. Although, the discussed image is true for a number of terrorist organizations, but it is no longer universally valid. Also, a generational change in leadership of wellknown groups is in many cases ushering in a more damaging and relentless type of organization. There are two general categories of terrorist organizations: networked and hierarchical. Newer organizations tend to employ the networked model, while strict Leninist or Maoist group tending towards hierarchical model to exercise centralized control. |
The organizational structure of a group determines its strengths and weaknesses. A general knowledge of the prevalent models of terrorist organizations leads to a better understanding of their capabilities. Knowledge of the different labels and systems of classification that have been applied to groups and individuals aid us in discarding useless or irrelevant terms, and in understanding the purposes and usefulness of different terminologies.
In recent times, the popular image of a terrorist group operating according to a specific political agenda and motivated by ideology or the desire for ethnic or national liberation dominated our understanding of terrorism. While still true of some terrorist organizations, this image is no longer universally valid. Also, a generational change in leadership of established groups is in many cases ushering in a more a destructive and relentless type of organization. There are two general categories of organization; hierarchical and networked. [...] Newer groups tend towards organizing or adapting to the possibilities inherent in the network model. [...] strict Leninist or Maoist groups tending towards centralized control and hierarchical structure. |
Fairly minor changes. The source is not mentioned anywhere in the thesis. |
|
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:WiseWoman, Zeitstempel: 20120413124131