|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 103, Zeilen: 45-47 |
Quelle: Krakau 1967 Seite(n): 140-141, Zeilen: S.140,29-33 - S.141,1.101 |
|---|---|
| Doch kam Richard Hofstadter in seiner Monographie über den „Social Darwinism in American Thought" zu dem Ergebnis:
[„Although concrete economic and strategic interests, such as Chinese trade and the vital necessity of sea power, were the prominent issues in the imperial debate, the movement took its rationale from more general ideological conceptions."[FN 151]] [FN 151: R. Hofstadter, op. cit., S. 179.] |
In seiner Monogrophie über den Social Darwinism kommt R. Hofstadter zu dem Ergebnis, daß, „although concrete economic and strategic interests, such as Chinese trade and the vital necessity of sea power, were the prominent issues in the imperial debate, the movement took its rationale from more general ideological conceptions"[FN 81].
[FN 81: Darwinism, S. 179.] |
- |
|