Kst/Befunde/Statistics

Summarising statistics

• The publication has 144 pages that have been analyzed. On a total of 64 of these pages violations of citation rules have been documented. This represents a percentage of 44.4 %. The 144 analyzed pages break down with respect to the amount of text parallels encountered as follows:
  • 16 pages with less than 50 % plagiarism
    • 010 021 034 041 043 045 064 065 070 075 099 136 137 138 142 151
  • 14 pages with between 50 %-75 % plagiarism
    • 012 014 015 039 040 046 059 067 076 102 141 143 145 146
  • 34 pages with more than 75 % plagiarism
    • 011 013 030 031 032 033 035 036 037 038 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 060 061 062 063 066 068 069 100 101 139 140 152
• From these statistics an extrapolation of the amount of text of the publication under investigation that has been documented as problematic can be estimated (conservatively) as about 25 % of the main part of the publication.
• Currently there are 82 reviewed fragments documented that are considered to be violations of citation rules. These can be assigned to different categories. (See section "Definitions of plagiarism categories")
  • For 78 of them there is no reference given to the source used („Übersetzungsplagiat“ (78) ).
  • For 4 fragments the source is given, but the extent of the used text is not made clear („Bauernopfer“).
• In all, text was taken from 20 sources.

• Documented and reviewed fragments of categories „Übersetzungsplagiate“ and „Bauernopfer“ are taken from 18 sources.
  • From 2 sources only fragments in the category of "Keine Wertung" (not evaluated) are documented:
    • Brücker (2010)
    • Holler Schuster (2016).