von George Danielidze
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
| [1.] Gd/Fragment 090 03 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2016-03-06 17:29:05 Schumann | Fragment, Gd, Gesichtet, International Crisis Group 2006, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 90, Zeilen: 3-10 |
Quelle: International Crisis Group 2006 Seite(n): 11, Zeilen: li. Spalte: 26ff |
|---|---|
| To some degree like Georgia, Armenia initially used its June 2005 “Framework proposal for its Action Plan” to ask the EU help addressing some of the consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It called for assistance in maintaining and strengthening the regime of ceasefire in the zone of the conflict and to work towards exclusively peaceful conflict settlement taking into account the right of people of Nagorno-Karabakh to self-determination. Besides, Armenia has requested the EU to refrain from funding any regional projects that increase its isolation and is looking forward to Brussels to encourage Ankara to open the borders with Armenia seeking to normalize relations. | To some degree like Georgia, Armenia initially used its June 2005 “Framework proposal for its Action Plan” to ask that the EU help address some of the consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It called for assistance in “maintaining and strengthening the regime of ceasefire” in the zone of the conflict and “to work towards exclusively peaceful conflict settlement taking into account the right of people of Nagorno-Karabakh to self-determination”.124 [...] Armenia has requested the EU to refrain from funding any regional projects that increase its isolation126 and has generally found a sympathetic ear when promoting the virtues of regional cooperation. It also seeks political support to help resolve its conflicts with Turkey, looking to Brussels to encourage Ankara to open the borders with Armenia,127 normalise relations and play a constructive role on Nagorno-Karabakh.128
124 “Framework Proposal for ENP Armenia Action Plan”, 15 June 2005. 126 During her visit to Armenia on 17 February 2006, Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner called economic integration in the South Caucasus a necessary condition for regional stability. She confirmed EU opposition to plans by Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey to build a regional railway bypassing Armenia. “A railway project that is not including Armenia will not get our financial support”. Anna Saghabalian, “EU Signals More Attention to Political Reform in Armenia”, RFE/RL, Armenialiberty, 17 February 2006, http://www.armenialiberty. org/armeniareport/report/en/2006/02/84CE2183-237B-4641-92EE-899C68818D0B.asp. 127 Framework Proposal for ENP Armenia Action Plan, op. cit., requested “EU assistance in reopening Kars-Gyumri railway”. 128 Crisis Group interviews, officials, ministry of foreign affairs, Yerevan, January-February 2006. On Turkey, see for example, European Parliament, “European Neighbourhood Policy”, text adopted 19 January 2006, Strasbourg, point 68. |
Die Quelle ist hier nicht genannt. Der nächste Absatz beginnt mit "Following the Crisis Group analysis" und am Ende des übernächsten Absatzes findet sich ein Verweis auf die Quelle. |
|
| [2.] Gd/Fragment 090 31 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2016-03-06 17:32:04 Schumann | Fragment, Gd, Gesichtet, International Crisis Group 2006, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 90, Zeilen: 31-33 |
Quelle: International Crisis Group 2006 Seite(n): 12, Zeilen: l. Spalte: 3ff |
|---|---|
| Only the following specific actions are indicated in the AP in order to contribute to the peaceful resolution of the conflict: increased diplomatic efforts; continued support for a peaceful solution; and increased support for the OSCE Minsk Group negotiation process. [Other sections refer to promoting sustained efforts for peace as well as aid for internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees, but the language is even weaker than that in the Georgian AP.] | Only four specific actions are intended to “contribute to the peaceful solution of the conflict”: increased diplomatic efforts; continued support for a peaceful solution; and increased support for the OSCE Minsk Group negotiation process; and likewise for people-to-people contacts. Other sections of the drafts refer to promoting sustained efforts for peace, de-mining, aid for internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees, and promoting the active involvement of civil society,133 but the language is even weaker than in the draft offered to Georgia.
133 Draft Elements for Inclusion in an EU/Armenia ENP Action Plan”, 28 December 2005, and “Draft Elements for Inclusion in an EU/Azerbaijan ENP Action Plan”, 23 February 2006. In the Azerbaijani draft these actions are highlighted, meaning they remain under discussion. The Armenian Action Plan points have been agreed. |
Die Quelle ist hier nicht genannt. |
|
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Schumann, Zeitstempel: 20160306173347