von George Danielidze
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
| [1.] Gd/Fragment 082 02 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-02-22 17:15:24 Schumann | BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gd, Gesichtet, Lynch 2003b, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 82, Zeilen: 2-18 |
Quelle: Lynch 2003b Seite(n): 171, 174, Zeilen: 171:4-20; 174:27-30 |
|---|---|
| Division of the member states over the Iraqi war, mentioned previously, was a bad proof for the CFSP, but on the other hand, the Iraqi crisis stimulated thinking on the development of an EU Security Strategy drafted by Mr. Javier Solana. A major point made in the Security Strategy is the need to have a belt of well-governed countries around the European Union.
On 11 March 2003, the European Commission published its Communication “Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours”. As I already previously examined, the South Caucasus states were a footnote in the Communication: “Given their location, the Southern Caucasus therefore also falls outside the geographic scope of this initiative for the time being.” But later, in June 2004, the three South Caucasian states, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, were rescued from obscurity in the draft EU Security Strategy approved at the Thessaloniki summit. The draft Strategy, entitled as “A Secure Europe in a Better World”, outlined the Union’s strategic circumstances, the variegated nature of threats facing the Union and the policies that must be considered in response. In the section on “Extending the Zone of Security around Europe”, the EU Strategy states: “We should take a stronger interest in the problems of the Southern Caucasus, which in due course will also be a neighbouring region.”138 138 Baev, Cornell – The South Caucasus. ISS, Dec. 2003. p.171 |
[Seite 171]
On 11 March 2003, the European Commission published its Communication ‘Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours’, which launched a debate about EU policy towards its new neighbours.2 The South Caucasus was a footnote in the Communication: ‘Given their location, the Southern Caucasus therefore also falls outside the geographic scope of this initiative for the time being.’ Then, in June 2003, the three South Caucasian states, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, were rescued from obscurity in the draft EU Security Strategy, written by Javier Solana and approved at the Thessaloniki summit.3 The draft Strategy, entitled ‘A Secure Europe in a Better World’, outlined the Union’s strategic circumstances, the variegated nature of threats facing the Union and the policies that must be considered in response. In the section on ‘Extending the Zone of Security around Europe’, the EU Strategy states: ‘We should take a stronger interest in the problems of the Southern Caucasus, which in due course will also be a neighbouring region.’ [Seite 174] More widely, the Iraqi crisis stimulated thinking on the development of an EU Security Strategy, drafted by Javier Solana. A major point made in the Security Strategy is the need to have a belt of well-governed countries on the EU’s borders. 2. ‘Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours’, Commission Communication COM(203), 104 final, Brussels, 11 March 2003. 3. ‘A Secure Europe in a Better World’, paper presented by Javier Solana, High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, European Council, Thessaloniki, 20 June 2003; http://ue.eu.int/pressdata/EN/reports/76255.pdf. |
Art und Umfang der Übernahme bleiben ungekennzeichnet. |
|
| [2.] Gd/Fragment 082 22 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-02-22 17:19:39 Schumann | Attinà 2004, Fragment, Gd, Gesichtet, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 82, Zeilen: 22-25, 27-32 |
Quelle: Attinà 2004 Seite(n): 21, 22, Zeilen: 21:45-46; 22:15-20 |
|---|---|
| The European Union offers the prospect of a stake in the EU’s internal market to those countries that make concrete progress demonstrating shared values and effective implementation of political, economic and institutional reforms. [In order to have a better overview of the ENP offered incentives please see the appendix 4.139]
As listed in the appendix 4, neighbouring countries are invited to take political and legislative measures to enhance economic integration and liberalization, and measures to promote human rights, cultural cooperation and mutual understanding. Besides, they are explicitly invited also to make steps towards regional security co-management and participate in initiatives aimed at improving conflict prevention and crisis management as well as strengthening co-operation to prevent and combat common security threats. [139 Appendix 4 p.182] |
[Seite 21]
The European Union offers the prospect of a stake in the EU’s internal market to those countries that make concrete progress demonstrating shared values and effective implementation of political, economic and institutional reforms. [Seite 22] Neighbouring countries are invited to take political and legislative measures to enhance economic integration and liberalization, and measures to promote human rights, cultural cooperation and mutual understanding. Besides these measures, which are coherent with the European view of regional security, neighbouring countries are explicitly invited also to make steps towards regional security co-management and participate in initiatives aimed at (a) improving conflict prevention and crisis management, and (b) strengthening co-operation to prevent and combat common security threats. |
Ohne Hinweis auf eine Übernahme. |
|
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Schumann, Zeitstempel: 20140222172000