|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 169, Zeilen: 11-14 |
Quelle: Fröhlich Peters 2007 Seite(n): 234, Zeilen: first paragraph |
|---|---|
| Moreover, studies in Western countries (Hon, 1995; Wrigley, 2002, Fröhlich et al., 2005) have shown that the organizational context definitely matters in terms of circumstances concerning the work-home conflict or male dominance, and in some cases the number of women varies between different types of public relations organizations.
Hon, L. (1995). Toward a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 27-88. Fröhlich, R. (2004). Feminine and feminist values in communication professions: Exceptional skills and expertise or 'friendliness trap'? In M. de Bruin and K. Ross (Eds.), Gender & newsroom cultures: Industries [sic] at work (pp. 67-80). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Wrigley, B. (2002). Glass ceiling? What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how women view the glass ceiling in public relations and communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 27-55. |
The Role of the Organizational Context
As shown previously, in Germany the number of women varies between different types of public relations organizations (Fröhlich et al., 2005). [...] However, qualitative U.S. studies (e.g., Hon, 1995; Wrigley, 2002) have shown that the organizational context definitely matters in terms of circumstances concerning the work-home conflict or male dominance. Hon, L. C. (1995). Towards a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 27–88. Fröhlich, R. (2004). Feminine and feminist values in communication professions: Exceptional skills and expertise or “friendliness trap?” In M. de Bruin & K. Ross (Eds.), Gender and newsroom cultures: Identities at work (pp. 65–77). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. Wrigley, B. J. (2002). Glass ceiling? What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how women view the glass ceiling in public relations and communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 27–55. |
The true source is not given. |
|